"Teaching God's Word to God's World"
2766 Airport Road, Peru, Indiana 46970, (765) 472-4111
Many
of us have been grieved for some time with the direction which the North
American Christian Convention has taken. They think nothing of having in
denominational persons to speak. They have had in every stripe of sectarian
imaginable. They are even having the sectarians to evaluate us as a
"Brotherhood." Last year they had a woman to preach. They have
absolutely no conscience of causing their own brethren pain. They claim to be
the strong ones. But we doctrinally sensitive brethren are considered the
weaker brethren. If this is
true,
and if they have liberty, why are they not careful to not cause us who are
weak, to stumble. Will we not be emboldened to go hear these teachers? Through
the knowledge that these N.A.C.C. leaders have, should the weaker brethren
perish for whom Christ died? When they sin so against the brethren, and wound
their weak consciences, they sin against Christ. Study that principle in the
following passage:
I Corinthians 8:9-12, "9 But take heed lest by any means this liberty
of yours become a stumbling block to them that are weak. 10 For if any man see
thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol's temple, shall not the
conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are
offered to idols. 11 And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish,
for whom Christ died? 12 But when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound
their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ."
If
we brethren, who feel that what they are doing is wrong, still go ahead and are
party to it, we have sinned against our conscience. The N.A.C.C. leaders prefer
to fellowship with false teachers instead of their own brethren. It is like a
family reunion. Some brethren would welcome their "gay" brother to
bring along his partner, even if their other brothers would not come if the
"gay" brother's partner was there.
The N.A.C.C. says that this is all done in the name of "Christ-ian unity and
tolerance." This is ludicrous. They prefer fellowship with those who are
admitted sectarians [I am a Baptist, I am a Methodist, etc.], and then they
turn around and call those of us who are offended at these
"sectarian" admissions, "the sectarians."
Now,
supposedly to please us, they bring in two Church of Christ apostates. They
could not have chosen two more disdained apostates of the Church of Christ than
Max Lucado and David Reagan. These men have left the position which the
Churches of Christ and Christian Churches have always held. Neither one of
these apostates believe baptism is essential to salvation. Both men
consistently "knock" the Church of Christ in their writings and
speeches. Both claim that you are "baptized because you are saved."
If you doubt the truth of what I am saying, visit their web sites and read
their literature or listen to their radio broadcasts.
If
the North American Christian Convention leaders all know this, and still have
these apostates come anyway, they should be rebuked. They should repent.
If
they do not know it, they are remiss in their duties as leaders of the N.A.C.C.
by not checking men out before bringing in wolves to feed the flock.
These
men left the Christian plea and are now apostate. To bring in men who knew the
Truth and abandoned it is worse than bringing in a Chuck Colson, who never knew
the Truth. I believe the N.A.C.C. leaders need to apologize to the Brotherhood.
I, for one, am tired of the "Repent and be Baptist" philosophy that
is so common among our Churches.